The future of the newspaper business is looking pretty dire, as people prefer to read news online rather than get printed copies, and it's a lot harder to charge for news online; also, newspaper classified sections can't compete with Craigslist, and that was a big part of their revenue. It makes me wonder, though, why newspapers must be a business. We have public television and public radio, why don't we have public newspapers? Maybe it smacks too much of Pravda, the state newspaper of the Soviet Union. But PBS and NPR certainly aren't propaganda outlets, so it should be possible to have non-profit newspapers, funded by the government and by private donations, that are journalistically independent. How come this hasn't happened yet? Do you think it will happen?

Update: I just found out about MinnPost, Voice of San Diego, and St. Louis Beacon, non-profit local papers. Are there others?

From: [identity profile] dougo.livejournal.com


I'm not saying they don't have their own biases. But they are not government propaganda outlets the way Pravda was. (If they were, Bill Moyers would not have kept his job the last eight years.)

From: [identity profile] dougo.livejournal.com


Well, OK, Kenneth Tomlinson tried to get Moyers fired. But, at least he failed?
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags