ext_3108 ([identity profile] novalis.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] dougo 2005-08-21 10:23 pm (UTC)

I think [livejournal.com profile] dougo is saying that generating some being which can pass the Turing Test is a valid way of passing the Turing Test. This implies that cp passes the Turing Test, if any program can pass. I think Turing's original definition is more narrow than this; and that narrowness prevents the test from contradiction our intuition.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting