Date: 2005-07-17 07:28 pm (UTC)
Well, devil's advocate: It's not the role of his employer to punish him for his art, but it is the role of this employer in particular to give travelers confidence in their safety. I don't know the backstory, but it seems to me that releasing a song in which someone going by his name threatens to fly a plane into a building might undermine said confidence, particularly if someone can identify him as a baggage screener.

The point isn't whether his art is immoral or illegal, it's that it actively works against the interests of his employer--interests he probably signed an agreement to uphold. I think my employer would probably fire me if I managed to get airplay for a song claiming I'd modified their spam filter to introduce viruses into customer intranets. I wouldn't blame them.

Anyway, he wanted attention, and now he's on national TV! Kudos.

And seriously, "against the war in Iraq" is a reason you respect Tucker Carlson? Because, long after he advocated for opening the barn door--a position he later said was "against his instincts" while he was publicly supporting it--he admitted maybe we shouldn't have let all those horses out? (On the same day (http://mediamatters.org/items/200406170002) he echoed the moronic "flip-flop" charges against John Kerry?) I'll agree he's not the worst of conservative TV personalities, but you're setting the bar pretty low.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags