dougo: (Default)
dougo ([personal profile] dougo) wrote2004-08-02 12:34 pm

This is the most important journal entry in the history of mankind

The LA Times has an article about the history of "this is the most important election" rhetoric:
"Every election, we always say this is the most important election ever. But this year we really mean it," a Sierra Club spokesman told USA Today four years ago, when George W. Bush and Al Gore squared off.

So, how does the Sierra Club feel about the 2004 contest? This time, they super-duper really mean it. "The problem with crying wolf is sometimes there really is a wolf," says Executive Director Carl Pope. "This time, there's a wolf."
Thanks to Wonkette.com for the link. And at the risk of this becoming an all-Wonkette-all-the-time journal, I noticed that AMC made yet another TV appearance this weekend, on CNN's media criticism show "Reliable Sources". I guess this means she's officially joined the ranks of the TV punditry class.

[identity profile] jfb.livejournal.com 2004-08-02 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
How about "This is the most important election ever, now that we bungled the last one."

A clear threat

[identity profile] mshonle.livejournal.com 2004-08-02 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
For me, this election will show if democracy in America works or not. It will show me if people believe in the constitution and if they can see beyond themselves to vote out of office someone who doesn't believe in the constitution.

I think this one Krugman editorial could explain why democracy might be failing. If the election comes down to "personality" like it did last time it will be a Baudrillardian passing of a time where once elections were real.

NPR's on the media had a good piece about how the media said the DNC was "not real" and "all staged"; yet when they reported it, instead of talking about the messages in the speeches, they just talked about trivia.

It's quite clear to me that media consolidation is at fault, and it's time to break up Murdock's empire into smaller companies (as well as the other giants). The system only works if we have the checks and ballances in place; and if you own TV-, cable-, radio-stations on top of owning a major newspaper, well, someone getting their news will only see one side.

[identity profile] lara7.livejournal.com 2004-08-02 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
>I guess this means she's officially joined the ranks of the TV >punditry class.

to me, she'll always be a Cal Grad student with a nose ring and the air of pretention common to all liberal arts grad students.

Let us know if Bill O'Reilly or Sean Hannity ever has her on...