Thanks. I just read it, and I disagree with a lot of its conclusions. Maybe I'll comment, but I'd need to think about it for a while—there's a whole lot to untangle, and I'm not sure we have enough common ground to even start with. Mainly, though, I don't see what it has to do with my question. Or is it just that people need the counterfactuals because their brains are wired to believe them?