Yes, the topic I wanted to discuss was on the level of person-to-person interaction, but so much for that idea. :)
Or was your point about religions doing collective harm meant to provide another reason to convert someone away from religion? That is, even if a person does not seem to be doing anything personally harmful, would you still want to change their mind about their religion based on the collective harm that the religion has done? I think I disagree with this motivation; I wouldn't try to persuade someone to renounce their national citizenship because of the collective harm that their nation's government has done. But maybe that's not a useful analogy.
no subject
Yes, the topic I wanted to discuss was on the level of person-to-person interaction, but so much for that idea. :)
Or was your point about religions doing collective harm meant to provide another reason to convert someone away from religion? That is, even if a person does not seem to be doing anything personally harmful, would you still want to change their mind about their religion based on the collective harm that the religion has done? I think I disagree with this motivation; I wouldn't try to persuade someone to renounce their national citizenship because of the collective harm that their nation's government has done. But maybe that's not a useful analogy.